The Travesty of TOLERANCE

Submitted by Rich B. on 8/12/06 at 6:54 PM. ( )

A Global Gospel
By Paul Proctor

There is a sobering question that now begs an answer from the 21st century church. Was the cross of Christ simply a lesson in tolerance? Was that a big wooden T that Jesus hung from two thousand years ago, illustrating a "higher power's" message to: "Go ye into all the world and be tolerant"? Did Jesus say: "For God so tolerated the world, that he gave his only begotten Son"? And did He tell His followers: "By this shall all men know that ye are my disciples, if ye have tolerance one for another"?

This is a crude example of equating God's love with today's tolerance... mixing and mingling traditional words and phrases with new age meanings and dialectic slogans like "Our strength is our diversity" in order to synthesize values and advance alternative agendas. Because of the ever-increasing perversion of our language by globalists it is necessary to qualify words like "love" and" tolerance" to avoid confusing them with biblical directives. Just as the love of a father toward his son is different from the love of a husband toward his wife or a boy's love for his dog or a dog's love for bones, tolerance too can have many different meanings and applications.

When modern definitions are mischievously applied to ancient principles for living, the outcome can be more than just confusing. It can be downright disastrous. Just such a travesty is unfolding before us in the church today through the ongoing amalgamation of lifestyles, beliefs, interpretations, principles, practices, definitions, rituals, religions, cultures and worldviews all for the purpose of forwarding the global gospel of "tolerance diversity and unity".

It may surprise many of you to learn that the word "tolerance" never even appeared in scripture until the 60's and 70's when the NEW American Standard and NEW International versions of the bible came into being. In the King James and original American Standard versions the word used was "forbearance" which itself could imply something altogether different. It should also be noted that at the time the NEW versions of the bible were printed, Marxist liberals were tenaciously teaching tolerance as the NEW measure of morality in America from kindergarten through seminary.

One would think, as much as that word is used today with respect to Christians, it would be found repeatedly throughout scripture. However, the reality is, it appears only once in the NIV and twice in the NASV as a brief encouragement for believers to put aside *personal differences and sufferings* for the sake of the Gospel. IT DOES NOT MEAN we are all to piously sit silent while the world's humanists, heretics and homosexuals twist and trash the Word of God to satisfy their own appetites and ambitions.

"Tolerance", as it is most commonly used today, is nothing more than a warm and fuzzy buzzword that was shrewdly employed by globalists to confuse and disarm believers, undermine the Church and contradict everything the Bible teaches about sin from Genesis to Revelation. "Tolerance" was never meant to replace love, righteousness, forgiveness or redemption. It is STILL the will of God that sin be exposed, confessed, repented-of, forgiven or judged...not tolerated for the sake of peace and unity. (Ephesians 5:11) "Tolerance" is not the Gospel of Christ but rather the tactical tool of ambitious men who dream of separating us from our Anchor Stone so we will drift away from "the peace of God which passeth all understanding" into a camouflaged chaos called Globalism.

Below are a few definitions for the word "tolerance" followed by a couple of scriptures that can help you determine for yourself which are new age and which are biblical. The biblical definition is really not that hard to see as long as your choice is consistent with the entirety of scripture.


1. The capacity to endure hardship or pain. (1st Peter 2:19)(Galatians2:20)

2. The endurance of the presence or actions of objectionable persons, or of the expression of offensive opinions. (Proverbs 14:17) (Matthew18:15-17)

3. The capacity for or the practice of recognizing and respecting the beliefs or practices of others. (2nd Corinthians 6:14-18) (James 4:4)

Now simply apply the biblical definition you chose to the only two verses in scripture where the word tolerance appears.

(Ephesians 4:1-2) "I therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you that ye walk worthy of the vocation wherewith ye are called, with all humility and gentleness, with patience, showing tolerance for one another in love" (The Apostle Paul is addressing Christians here, not the various cultures and religions of the world.)

(Romans 2:4) "Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance" (Once again, Paul is referring to the tolerance of God toward His redeemed, not the enemies of the cross.)

Another relatively simple way of determining where tolerance is appropriate is by knowing at whose expense the offense comes...yours or God's? Tolerance would probably be in order if say someone called you a liar. Lashing back at your accuser with an equally harsh attack wouldn't glorify God in the least or accomplish anything of eternal value. However, tolerance would most definitely NOT be appropriate if that same person, Christian or not, willfully misrepresented, misquoted or in some way impugned the character or integrity of the Almighty with lies and distortions. In this situation a firm rebuke of some sort using scripture would be proper to defend the faith. As Christians, that is what we are called to do. (2 Timothy 4:2-4)

This takes courage and a self-sacrificing kind of love. Silence in the name of tolerance, in such situations, would only demonstrate cowardice and indifference to the One we call Lord; the very opposite of the love He teaches and not unlike what we see in the church today. Even then, rebukes should be carried out with God's interest in mind, not our own. We tend to defend most fervently that which we love and are the most proud of. If it is God and His Word that we defend then we are being Christ-like. If it is ourselves we so passionately defend then we are probably, self-centered, pride-driven and carnal.

Even though many of our Christian institutions have been swept clean of these tolerance teachers, the counterfeit communion they served for so many years is still being passed down the aisles in many churches today. Is it any wonder that practicing homosexuals are now "married" and "ordained" by a clergy who publicly questions the very deity of Christ and casually brings His claim of being "The Way, The Truth and The Life" up for a congregational vote? This, my friends, is the filthy fruit of tolerance and an undeniable sign of the desperate times we are now entering. If this isn't the Apostasy then I don't know what is.

The cross is a lot of things to a lot of people but it IS NOT a lesson in tolerance. If God were tolerant of sin He never would have sacrificed His "Only Begotten" to suffer and die so horrendously for the likes of you and me. He would have simply winked at Him and said, "Ah...That's OK...Just stay here. They'll clean up their act sooner or later". But that never happened because the Bible says:

"For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." (Isaiah 55:8-9)

Yes, the cross of Christ was an act of divine love but it was also a vivid demonstration of God's absolute intolerance for sin."

"Beware lest anyone spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ." (Colossians 2:8)

Return to Current Events Category Menu

This response submitted by The Ghost of Vernon Wayne Howell on 8/12/06 at 8:15 PM. ( )

Please post some religious stuff on our site, we have 94 members now and tomorrow's Sunday and I need to teach the flock about
The Travesty of TOLERANCE


This response submitted by Alex Sr on 8/12/06 at 10:02 PM. ( )

A very informative article.


This response submitted by god on 8/12/06 at 10:46 PM. ( )

Organized religion has been around for thousands of years. It has touched many individual lives, but in your collective society it has changed little. As a group you are still dealing with the same problems that confronted you at the beginning. The problems of greed, envy, anger, righteousness, inequity, violence, and war.
Most organized religions have not led you away from these behaviors, but more fully into them. In some cases they have actually justified them, even by their own example.
Religion, it was hoped, would bring your world closer to god, creating a sense of communion with the divine. Yet many organized religions have not done that. They have touched some individual lives in this way, but your collective society experinces not communion, but estrangement; not unity with god, but separation. In some cases, it is organized religion that actually teaches separation from god.
Religion, it was hoped, would bring people closer to each other, producing a sense of community and integration. Yet many organized religions have not done that. They have touched some lives in this way, but your collective society has experienced exactly the opposite. In fact, in some cases it is organized religion itself that preaches against community and integration, claiming god never intended people of varying races, cultures, and nationalities to commingle, much less inter-marry or co-create.
It was hoped that religion would bring your world a greater sense of joy and freedom, but in too many cases it has not done so. In fact, few institutions have sone more to bind and shackle and restrict the human spirit, presenting long lists of what one must and must not do, must and must not wear, must and must not eat, must and must not think, must and must not enjoy.
Indeed, some organized religions have encumbered many human joys with guilt by proclaiming that much of what you love is bad. Money is bad, power is bad, sex is bad, music and dancing is bad, in some places even being seen is bad. Cover yourself! Hide yourself! Protect yourself! Be ashamed of yourself!
These have been the lessons of so many of your religions. These have been their teachings. Yet the real message of god is not shame, intolerance, exclusivity, separation, and subjugation.The real message of god is joy, acceptance, unity, freedom, and unconditional love.
Most of the killing and most of the domination and most of the suppression and most of the terror on your planet has been carried out under the banner of organized religion and in the name of god. The two hundred years of the Christian Crusades are a prime example, during which people were slaughtered in the name of Christ.
This kind of religios insanity continues to this very day, on which you murder with the invocation,"Allah is great!" The enormous irony and the immense sadness is that some humans do not even see the contradiction.
This is the effect that your organized religions of exclusivity and righteousness and retribution have had on you. They have solved nothing. They have, in fact, enlarged the very problems they were intened to solve.

Not God but a book called:

This response submitted by Cecil on 8/12/06 at 11:10 PM. ( )

The New Revelations: A Conversation with God
By Neale Donald Walsch

God is a plagiarist! LOL

With regards to the above article on tolerance...

This response submitted by Terry on 8/13/06 at 5:45 AM. ( )

...It seems to me that we sometimes want to have this image of Christ being the loving sort who turned the other cheek. And while His message was one of love, I think we'd be kidding ourselves to think that our Saviour practiced tolerance on the level we see today or that He would approve of the bending going on in some denominations. I really don't believe that Christ would be as tolerant as some would like to believe. Love can come without tolerance- really. How many of you reading this are parents? (I am) There are some things my kids can try/do that I am not tolerant of at all- not one iota. That doesn't mean I don't love them. I'm sure Jesus would have no trouble loving us but I also do not believe in my heart of hearts He would be tolerant of a great many things watering down our churches and our society today.

The following chapter is from the book "Waking the Dead" by John Eldredge. In it Mr. Eldredge is pointing out that our Lord is a warrior. Not all of the following passage applies, but I will type the whole paragraph...

"No pale-faced altar boy, the whole life of Christ is marked by battle and confrontation. He kicks out demons with a stern command. He rebukes a fever and it leaves Peter's mother-in-law. He rebukes a storm and it subsides. He confronts the Pharisees time and again to set God's people free from legalism. In a loud voice He wakes Lazarus from the dead. He decends to hell, wrestles the keys from Satan, and leads a train of captives free. And when He returns, I might point out, Jesus will come mounted on a steed of war, with His robe dipped in blood, armed for battle."

Based on this description, does this sound like someone who is tolerant? Jesus is very clear in the New Testament about taking the message to the world but, at the same time, keeping ourselves as believers free of the world. I really don't see- for those that talk about going to church and believing in God- what's so hard to get about that. Take out your Bible (yours, not mine... ) and see for yourself. Read what it says. Talk to a pastor or priest. It's all there- honest.

Does it sound presumptuous to claim to know the mind of Christ? Maybe to some degree... But that's exactly what a Christian walk is- our walk with our Lord. Through daily prayer and scripture, we focus on what's above and the answers will come to us.

And regarding these threads, as I'm sure it will be brought up again, about how no one is reached by such postings...

Cecil's assertion (shared by others I am sure) is that no one will be won over on here. Fair enough. Maybe he's correct. BUT...

Nothing ventured, nothing gained? :-)

Christ says the fields are ripe, and that some will sow and some will reap. Perhaps the reaping will not happen here, but that doesn't mean sowing need not happen. (John 4:34-38)

We are told in Romans "How can they hear without someone preaching to them?" and also "How beautiful are the feet of those who bring good news!" (Romans 10:14-15)

Are there maybe better platforms or routes to share? Perhaps. That doesn't mean avenues such as this should be overlooked.

To one and all, have a phenomenal Sunday. :-)

Return to Current Events Category Menu