Soft tanned capes vs. unbroken tanned capes

Submitted by Steve on 02/24/2004 at 12:20. ( ) 216.129.231.7

I was just wondering if there is any advantage to using a soft broken cape, like you get from a tannery, in mounting heads vs. using a cape that is tanned, but relatively hard. In other words, skipping the breaking phase in tanning. It seems like they would lose their softness anyhow once they were rehydrated so I can't see any difference. I was wondering if there would be less shrinkage or any other affect. So anyhow I thought I'd ask the pros...

Return to Tanning Category Menu


Steve...YOU CAN NOT MOUNT a hide that is broking

This response submitted by . on 02/24/2004 at 21:40. ( . ) 138.89.114.67

It would remand soft.


Tanneries send them back in a soft broken state.

This response submitted by Steve A. on 02/25/2004 at 11:47. ( ) 216.129.231.7

I imagine tanneries do it this way because they have really nice large tumblers to clean, soften, and dry their capes. Most of my capes I do myself. They dry out really hard after tanning because I skip the breaking phase, but they rehydrate and mount up fine. I've mounted a few from tanneries and they seem to mount up exactly the same. Just wondering if there could be any differences over the long haul. Just curious.


Return to Tanning Category Menu